KJB Textual Technology

  • To Readers: The website is subject to ongoing revision to optimize the language
  • Home page: Summarizing the primary content of the present website
  • About Dr Bednar
  • Books available
  • Contact us
  • Unscholarly & uncivil internet criticism of the KJV-Only position
  • The nature of modern English versions: An introduction to the topic
  • Introducing the case for inerrancy preservation: The role of scholarship
  • Inerrancy preservation in the KJV illustrating the Divine Hand on text history
  • Refuting claims by scholars of error in the KJV, based on items from the essays
  • Essay 1 -Our guide to eternity: God's Word or text-tinkering of scholars?
  • Essay 2 - Inerrancy & Greek-manuscript variance: An Introduction to the topic
  • Essay 3 -Is there evidence of tampering by Gnostics in Alexandrian Greek texts?
  • Essay 4 -Outstanding accuracy of the Greek Received Text
  • a- 1 John 5:7,8 -Establishing the authenticity of the Johannine Comma
  • b. -Acts 20:28 - The Blood of God, or the blood of his own: Our unique Savior
  • c -Col.1:14 -Redemption through the blood of the Savior
  • d- 1 Pet. 4:1 Jesus did not have any sin of his own to suffer for
  • e- Order of Resurrection Morning events in the gospels
  • f -John 8 -The adulterous woman & the missing man: Proving passage authenticity
  • g- The Received Text -No support given to works or universal salvation
  • h- The Received Text -No renderings based upon conjecture
  • i -R.T. Inerrancy: Exact equivalence preserves it; textual evidence reveals it
  • j -Evidence that the Received-Text ancestor is older than Alexandrian texts
  • k. The Biblical Christmas story: Identifying the star & the wise men
  • l -Jude 25 "God our Savior" is a correct indirect reference to the Trinity
  • m -The authenticity of the concluding doxology of the Lord's Prayer
  • n. -Which is correct, the Sermon on the Mount, or the sermon on the plain?
  • Essay 5 -The KJV preserves the accuracy of the Received Text: Various examples
  • a- Acts 12:4 -"Easter" is correct: One case where "passover" does not apply
  • b -The KJV: Distinguished by never teaching salvation by works to its readers
  • c- The Holy Spirit and the use of the pronouns "it" and "itself"
  • d -Is Jesus or Joshua referenced in Hebrews 4:8 and Acts 7:45?
  • e -The KJV never teaches abuse of the body to its readers
  • f -Mt.2:1-12 The KJV wise men vs. modern-version magi
  • g -The love of money really is the root of all evil, not just some evil
  • h -Which rendering is correct, devils or demons? The nature of evil
  • i -Hebrews 10:23 "Faith" or "hope?" Which one is the correct rendering?
  • j -Matthew 23:24 Is the right reading "Strain at a gnat" or "strain out a gnat?"
  • k -Saved or always being saved? Is there a sense in which salvation is ongoing?
  • l. Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit: Is there just one correct name or two?
  • m. -1 Pet.3:20-21 "Saved by water" is not salvation by water
  • n -Exact equivalence in traditional KJV editions preserves inerrancy
  • Essay 6 -Uniqueness & total accuracy of the Masoretic Hebrew/Aramaic Text
  • a- Ps.12 -God preserves His Word for His godly people; Also the ben Chayyim text
  • b. The Bible Rightly Designates animal species: Exposing the evolutionist agenda
  • c -No contradiction of numbers, names, etc. - Chronicles Amplification
  • -- 1. The years that king Asa reigned: Adding a figurative sense to the literal
  • -- 2. Age of king Jehoiachin: Did this king begin to reign at age 8 or 18?
  • -- 3. Was Ahaziah 42 years old or 22 years old when he began to reign in Judah?
  • -- 4. The great price of a sin of David: Does 2 Samuel contradict 1 Chronicles?
  • -- 5. Syrian horsemen & footmen slain by David: Do the numbers properly add-up?
  • -- 6. Horsemen, horses, stalls & chariots for king Solomon
  • -- 7. Amplification variance: How king Saul died: 2 Samuel amplifies 1 Samuel
  • d -Pattern Amplification: Clarifying patterns of Hebrew-text expression
  • --1. The number of years king Saul reigned in Israel - 1 Samuel 13:1
  • --2. 2 Sam.15:7 Did Absalom need 40 years or 4 years to overthrow King David?
  • e -Suggested other types of contradiction in scripture are refuted
  • --1. The number of Hebrews returning from the exile in Babylon
  • --2. Why king Saul fails to recognize David during the incident with Goliath
  • --3. The role of Hebrew-text qere marginal notes: Isa.9:3 - Joy or no joy?
  • -4. Was Nineveh in Jonah's day much larger than major modern-day cities?
  • f -Key Hebrew-text history: The Dead- Sea scrolls & the Samaritan Pentateuch
  • g - Exodus 25:31 - Is the Menorah a "she" or "he" or an "it"
  • Essay 7 -The KJV preserves the total accuracy of the Masoretic Text
  • a- Dan 3 Aramaic -Christ in theophany: The Son of God, not a son of the gods
  • b- Who killed Goliath -David or Elhanen? The unique nature of the name Goliath
  • c -YHVH -Gods sacred name that is never to be spoken by sinners
  • d -True science in the KJV: Identifying the "firmament" in the Creation account
  • e. -Why mythical creatures are presented in the KJV: Following correct Hebrew
  • f. -Is The correct rendering "Lucifer" or "Morning Star"? A danger of confusion
  • g. -Exodus 20:13 "Thou shalt not kill" or "You shall not murder?"
  • h. -Proverbs 18:24 Showing ourselves friendly, or coming to ruin?
  • Essay 8 -God's spoken Word in written form: The case for Dictation Inspiration
  • Essay 9 -The KJV as a true agent of text inerrancy preservation
  • Essay 10 -Problems with application of textual criticism of the Bible
  • Essay 11 - The uniqueness of God's Word: Perspectives of Bible-believers
  • a -One unchanging bible speaks inerrantly to ancient and modern people
  • b -Mk.16:16-18 -Significance of early miraculous signs & Christian baptism
  • c -The Resurrection of Christ and His people: A reality that extends to eternity
  • d -Christians are not called to be slaves: "Servants" fits all contexts
  • e -The Crucifixion hour -Did the Crucifixion occur at the 3rd hour or the 6th?
  • f -The authenticity of the big-fish experience of Jonah & the supportive science
  • g -Giant dinosaurs and their sea-going relatives are in the biblical book of Job
  • h. -Ps 22:16,8 Pierced my hands & my feet, or like a lion my hands and my feet?
  • Essay 12 -100 erroneous criticisms of the KJV & its textual basis
  • Essay 13 -KJV classical language of emphasis: Acts 5:30, Titus 2:13, 1 Chr. 5:26
  • Essay 14 -KJV older English glorifies God & favors study: Dayspring from on high
  • Essay 15 A Translation that God approves: Replenish the earth, John Baptist, etc
  • Essay 16 -Should faith in text accuracy be vested in scholar opinion?
  • Essay 17 -Refuting claims of dynamic equivalence in the KJV
  • Essay 18 -Biblical doctrine: a. Did Moses persuade God to change His mind?
  • b. -Why God questioned Adam & Eve about eating forbidden fruit
  • c. -Sermon on the Mount: Is it for churches? Did Christ teach works salvation?
  • d. -Mark 10:17,18 -Why callest thou me good? Christ did not deny His own deity
  • e. -Was God unfair in judging Egypt & Pharaoh after hardening Pharaoh's heart?
  • f -Does the Old Testament teach soul sleep in Sheol? Saul & the woman of Endor
  • g. -Can Old Testament institutions be restored in the Millennium?
  • Essay 19 -Topics on creation vs evolution: Which one is technically correct?
  • Associated organizations with goals related to those of this website


Essay 18e


                     Was God Unfair in Judging Egypt & Pharaoh

                                  after hardening Pharaoh's heart? 

Skeptics question the righteousness of God, due to His judgment of Pharaoh & Egypt after He hardened Pharaoh's heart, thinking this would be expected to make Pharaoh unable to respond to the command to release the Hebrews who had been in bondage of slavery in Egypt for many years. Actually, this view is one-sided and inappropriate, the skeptics failing to understand the subtlety by which the Hebrew text presents history at times, a subtlety that requires some objective analysis.

The fact that Egypt and its Pharaoh's enslaved and brutally mistreated God's Hebrew people requires a response from God, yet He responds in a totally appropriate and fair manner. What skeptics don't grasp is that God would have hardened Pharaoh's heart simply by presenting righteous demands that irritate a man who views himself as a god, and does things according to what is proper in his own sight, a man who thus felt no regrets whatever over his behavior and judgments. The only thing God needs to do to harden Pharaoh's heart is to present the reasonable demand to free the Hebrews, so hardening by God was simply a motivation of latent hardness in Pharaoh's heart.

This is the appropriate logical view of God's judgment, and it is presented in an article by a Mike Montgomery, who is not a scholar (To review his article readers can consult  www.salvationbygracealone.com/pharaohsheart.html). Pharaoh evidently did not have the slightest sense of his own unjust behavior and that of his nation in their mistreatment of the Hebrews. Pharaoh had long ago hardened his own heart against any sense of sin & error, and all that God would need do to finalize the matter is to make demands that would arouse resentment & anger in this one who considered himself a god, and viewed his ways & opinions as beyond question. This would be why he told Moses to show evidence of the power of the God of the Hebrews, and would be why he discounted the works of God displayed by Moses, until he eventually beg- an to make concessions. The concessions weren't fruitful, indicating Pharaoh & Egypt had long ago passed beyond any possibility of being spared any of the judgment of God. 

Contextual/grammatical considerations

Exodus 7:3 marks God's intention to soon begin hardening Pharaoh's heart, and this would be in the above-noted sense of hardening by motivating and allowing the natural hardness of his heart to control outcomes. Logically, the KJV follows this intent as the plagues commence at verse 7:13, rendering the verb harden here with the same sense of God causing the hardening. From the grammatical standpoint, the initial 7:3 verb marking the intent of God to harden Pharaoh's heart, is the hifil-stem type having a causative sense, mean- ing God will cause the hardening in the sense noted above; the verse 7:13 verb is a simple qal-stem type that marks the beginning of the hardening by God, as indicated by the KJV he hardened Pharaoh's heart, referring to God, while modern versions utilize the common stative verb sense in Pharaoh's heart was hardened, or became hard, which doesn't identify any causative factor. Either type of rendering is possible grammatically, as seen by the fact that the KJV rendering of same verb form in verse 7:22 is was hardened. Context controls the rendering, and in 7:13 the KJV continues the sense of God's hardening first noted in verse 4:21 & verse 7:3. Verse 7:13 marks the initial meeting with Pharaoh, and it seems appropriate at this point to speak of God hardening him, and this is logically followed by the rendering that his heart was hardened in verse 7:22, a verb form introducing the dual sense of the hardening as including that of  Pharaoh himself. Further, verses 8:15, 32 note Pharaoh as hardening his own heart, evidently to emphasize further the dual hardening sense. 

Regarding the dual hardening role, throughout the passage on the plagues, the causative hifil sense appears a few times, and  the piel stem often appears and presents the causative aspect of the piel intensive sense. Overall, the text sometimes says God hardened Pharaoh's heart, and at other times it says that Pharaoh hardened his own heart, and at other times it presents a stative sense of the verb that simply reveals the hardened state of his heart, without assign- ing the cause. The various verb senses seen throughout the plagues narrative represent interchanging of factors involved in the hardening, so we must con- sider overall implications of the text as the primary guide to interpretation.