KJB Textual Technology

  • To Readers: The website is subject to ongoing revision to optimize the language
  • Home page: Summarizing the primary content of the present website
  • About Dr Bednar
  • Books available
  • Contact us
  • Unscholarly & uncivil internet criticism of the KJV-Only position
  • The nature of modern English versions: An introduction to the topic
  • Introducing the case for inerrancy preservation: The role of scholarship
  • Inerrancy preservation in the KJV illustrating the Divine Hand on text history
  • Refuting claims by scholars of error in the KJV, based on items from the essays
  • Essay 1 -Our guide to eternity: God's Word or text-tinkering of scholars?
  • Essay 2 - Inerrancy & Greek-manuscript variance: An Introduction to the topic
  • Essay 3 -Is there evidence of tampering by Gnostics in Alexandrian Greek texts?
  • Essay 4 -Outstanding accuracy of the Greek Received Text
  • a- 1 John 5:7,8 -Establishing the authenticity of the Johannine Comma
  • b. -Acts 20:28 - The Blood of God, or the blood of his own: Our unique Savior
  • c -Col.1:14 -Redemption through the blood of the Savior
  • d- 1 Pet. 4:1 Jesus did not have any sin of his own to suffer for
  • e- Order of Resurrection Morning events in the gospels
  • f -John 8 -The adulterous woman & the missing man: Proving passage authenticity
  • g- The Received Text -No support given to works or universal salvation
  • h- The Received Text -No renderings based upon conjecture
  • i -R.T. Inerrancy: Exact equivalence preserves it; textual evidence reveals it
  • j -Evidence that the Received-Text ancestor is older than Alexandrian texts
  • k. The Biblical Christmas story: Identifying the star & the wise men
  • l -Jude 25 "God our Savior" is a correct indirect reference to the Trinity
  • m -The authenticity of the concluding doxology of the Lord's Prayer
  • n. -Which is correct, the Sermon on the Mount, or the sermon on the plain?
  • Essay 5 -The KJV preserves the accuracy of the Received Text: Various examples
  • a- Acts 12:4 -"Easter" is correct: One case where "passover" does not apply
  • b -The KJV: Distinguished by never teaching salvation by works to its readers
  • c- The Holy Spirit and the use of the pronouns "it" and "itself"
  • d -Is Jesus or Joshua referenced in Hebrews 4:8 and Acts 7:45?
  • e -The KJV never teaches abuse of the body to its readers
  • f -Mt.2:1-12 The KJV wise men vs. modern-version magi
  • g -The love of money really is the root of all evil, not just some evil
  • h -Which rendering is correct, devils or demons? The nature of evil
  • i -Hebrews 10:23 "Faith" or "hope?" Which one is the correct rendering?
  • j -Matthew 23:24 Is the right reading "Strain at a gnat" or "strain out a gnat?"
  • k -Saved or always being saved? Is there a sense in which salvation is ongoing?
  • l. Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit: Is there just one correct name or two?
  • m. -1 Pet.3:20-21 "Saved by water" is not salvation by water
  • n -Exact equivalence in traditional KJV editions preserves inerrancy
  • Essay 6 -Uniqueness & total accuracy of the Masoretic Hebrew/Aramaic Text
  • a- Ps.12 -God preserves His Word for His godly people; Also the ben Chayyim text
  • b. The Bible Rightly Designates animal species: Exposing the evolutionist agenda
  • c -No contradiction of numbers, names, etc. - Chronicles Amplification
  • -- 1. The years that king Asa reigned: Adding a figurative sense to the literal
  • -- 2. Age of king Jehoiachin: Did this king begin to reign at age 8 or 18?
  • -- 3. Was Ahaziah 42 years old or 22 years old when he began to reign in Judah?
  • -- 4. The great price of a sin of David: Does 2 Samuel contradict 1 Chronicles?
  • -- 5. Syrian horsemen & footmen slain by David: Do the numbers properly add-up?
  • -- 6. Horsemen, horses, stalls & chariots for king Solomon
  • -- 7. Amplification variance: How king Saul died: 2 Samuel amplifies 1 Samuel
  • d -Pattern Amplification: Clarifying patterns of Hebrew-text expression
  • --1. The number of years king Saul reigned in Israel - 1 Samuel 13:1
  • --2. 2 Sam.15:7 Did Absalom need 40 years or 4 years to overthrow King David?
  • e -Suggested other types of contradiction in scripture are refuted
  • --1. The number of Hebrews returning from the exile in Babylon
  • --2. Why king Saul fails to recognize David during the incident with Goliath
  • --3. The role of Hebrew-text qere marginal notes: Isa.9:3 - Joy or no joy?
  • -4. Was Nineveh in Jonah's day much larger than major modern-day cities?
  • f -Key Hebrew-text history: The Dead- Sea scrolls & the Samaritan Pentateuch
  • g - Exodus 25:31 - Is the Menorah a "she" or "he" or an "it"
  • Essay 7 -The KJV preserves the total accuracy of the Masoretic Text
  • a- Dan 3 Aramaic -Christ in theophany: The Son of God, not a son of the gods
  • b- Who killed Goliath -David or Elhanen? The unique nature of the name Goliath
  • c -YHVH -Gods sacred name that is never to be spoken by sinners
  • d -True science in the KJV: Identifying the "firmament" in the Creation account
  • e. -Why mythical creatures are presented in the KJV: Following correct Hebrew
  • f. -Is The correct rendering "Lucifer" or "Morning Star"? A danger of confusion
  • g. -Exodus 20:13 "Thou shalt not kill" or "You shall not murder?"
  • h. -Proverbs 18:24 Showing ourselves friendly, or coming to ruin?
  • Essay 8 -God's spoken Word in written form: The case for Dictation Inspiration
  • Essay 9 -The KJV as a true agent of text inerrancy preservation
  • Essay 10 -Problems with application of textual criticism of the Bible
  • Essay 11 - The uniqueness of God's Word: Perspectives of Bible-believers
  • a -One unchanging bible speaks inerrantly to ancient and modern people
  • b -Mk.16:16-18 -Significance of early miraculous signs & Christian baptism
  • c -The Resurrection of Christ and His people: A reality that extends to eternity
  • d -Christians are not called to be slaves: "Servants" fits all contexts
  • e -The Crucifixion hour -Did the Crucifixion occur at the 3rd hour or the 6th?
  • f -The authenticity of the big-fish experience of Jonah & the supportive science
  • g -Giant dinosaurs and their sea-going relatives are in the biblical book of Job
  • h. -Ps 22:16,8 Pierced my hands & my feet, or like a lion my hands and my feet?
  • Essay 12 -100 erroneous criticisms of the KJV & its textual basis
  • Essay 13 -KJV classical language of emphasis: Acts 5:30, Titus 2:13, 1 Chr. 5:26
  • Essay 14 -KJV older English glorifies God & favors study: Dayspring from on high
  • Essay 15 A Translation that God approves: Replenish the earth, John Baptist, etc
  • Essay 16 -Should faith in text accuracy be vested in scholar opinion?
  • Essay 17 -Refuting claims of dynamic equivalence in the KJV
  • Essay 18 -Biblical doctrine: a. Did Moses persuade God to change His mind?
  • b. -Why God questioned Adam & Eve about eating forbidden fruit
  • c. -Sermon on the Mount: Is it for churches? Did Christ teach works salvation?
  • d. -Mark 10:17,18 -Why callest thou me good? Christ did not deny His own deity
  • e. -Was God unfair in judging Egypt & Pharaoh after hardening Pharaoh's heart?
  • f -Does the Old Testament teach soul sleep in Sheol? Saul & the woman of Endor
  • g. -Can Old Testament institutions be restored in the Millennium?
  • Essay 19 -Topics on creation vs evolution: Which one is technically correct?
  • Associated organizations with goals related to those of this website


Essay 7-c

  YHVH: God's Sacred Name that is Never to Be Spoken by Sinners                            

The Unknown Pronunciation

God’s name YHWH, unlawful for Hebrews to speak, doesn’t have its own select vowels. Evidently the name isn't meant to be spoken by anyone since many are inclined to desecrate that which is holy, accidentally or intentionally. Scholars never seem to realize this, steadily trying to figure out the pronun- ciation. They vary widely in their notions of how to pronounce it, and indeed manuscripts & editions of the Hebrew text itself vary in the written or printed vocalization, all in accord with an historic lack of knowledge of the pronun- ciation. Various historic figures of Hebrew history have held differing opin- ions on the true pronunciation, and the historian Josephus even said letters of the name should all be pronounced as vowels since they've served as semi- vowels, consonants that do double duty.

In Exo.6:3 God tells Moses He has never been known by this name, and in Exo. 3:14 He gave it to Moses in terms of its meaning, I AM THAT I AM, or more briefly I AM. Evidently, God will not allow pronunciation of the actual name by sinful mankind, and the evidence indicates the name has not had revealed vowels since before the origination of Exodus and the Pentateuch at ~1450 B.C, and likely throughout text history. The term appears in Job, the oldest book of the Bible, but God has never been known by that name since its pro- nunciation has never been known. The term I AM appears in the New Testa- ment as Christ invokes it to reveal His equality with YHWH in terms of deity.

 Variant Adopted Pronunciation

In cases where the name appears in the absence of another term for God, Masoretes assigned to it vowels of Adonai, with a slight modification, to yield a name that native Hebrew scholars say defies Hebrew linguistics, and can't be the actual pronunciation. When the name appears directly adjacent to Adonai in the text, Masoretes assigned vowels of Elohim, which serves to further en- sure a lack of knowledge of the actual pronunciation. Hebrews pronounce the name as Adonai, or the name, or Elohim.

The sacred name is usually rendered the title LORD in English translations, but is rendered Jehovah in the KJV in places where context requires a name, rather than a title. Jehovah suits Gentiles, but isn’t a Hebrew or Aramaic name, and Hebrew has no J, so many deny it’s a name of God, but it’s long been in the KJV for a good reason. The name Jehovah, in place of unutterable YHWH, makes unapproachable holy God personal, for the name was created by applying to YHWH vowels of Adonai that means my Lord. This suggests, in the Old Testament, Christ who would later make God personal as our Lord (He taught us to say our Father - Mt.6:9). In cases where YHWH appears be- side Adonai in the text, assigned vowels of plural Elohim imply a reference to the plurality of the Trinity in God's person in the Old Testament (certain other entities are signified in certain contexts), and Christ’s equality with YHWH in the Trinity is His authority to make God personal.

The link of Christ to Adonai, Elohim and Jehovah indicates that the meaning of YHWH, I AM THAT I AM, providentially links to Jehovah to render it an approved alternative pronunciation of YHWH revealed by God to Moses in Ex.6:3 of the KJV. Jehovah looks like a providentially-ordained pronun-ciation that extends to Gentiles, prevention of actual name pronunciation. This is logical since Christ brought Gentiles who believe in God into Israel's herit- age (Eph.2:11-22) so that through Christ, Gentiles too are to keep the name holy and undefiled. Through Christ, it's no longer necessary for Gentiles to leave their culture and join the Hebrew nation to be a part of God's people, which was the case in the Old Testament era (Lev.19:33,34), but all of God's people are to adopt all aspects of reverence for God. Christians should expect to keep God's sacred name undefiled since chapter 4 of the Revelation shows how greatly He is to be sanctified by God's people, Hebrew and Gentile, in His eternal kingdom.

The personal name Jehovah offers pronunciation that would be expected if an effort is made to vocalize the sacred name when vowels of Adonai are applied, and use of this name seems to be intentional, not as scholars say, a misun- derstanding of the purpose of such vowels. The purpose is to give Gentiles an approved alternative pronunciation of the sacred name to avoid speaking the actual one, as is the case with Hebrew use of Adonai.

Technical Commentary

That YHWH, known technically as the Tetragrammaton, incorporates point- ing (vowel system) of other names for God shows that pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton is unique, and thus very different from that of other terms relating to God. We easily view pronunciation of this unique name as having a special purpose.

We have noted that the sacred name is assigned vowels of Adonai when it appears in the absence of another name for God, yet when this is done, the compound shewa, hateph patach, under the gutteral first letter of Adonai ch- anges to simple shewa without a patach under the yod of YHWH. Use of simple shewa denies the usual assignment of qere vowels, and the reason can relate to Jehovah as an alternative pronunciation of YHWH for Gentiles that avoids the true pronunciation. In anglicizing of the term, the transliterated "e" of simple shewa supports the Jeh initial part of Jehovah and eliminates the "a" of patach in the compound shewa, and the loss of patach accords with normal assigning of simple shewa to non-gutteral yod of the first consonant of YHWH. This is unique in that one grammar rule is seemingly violated to apply another one in the case of YHWH


In this matter involving the most unique term in the Hebrew text, it appears that "e" is emphasized to the extent that normal pointing of the qere per- petuum (means qere tradition, not a visible qere marginal note) doesn't apply. Thus Yehowah, while not the true pronunciation anymore than Yahweh is, can be understood as related to an intended role for Gentile use of YHWH in the form of Jehovah to avoid the true pronunciation. Indeed, riseing use of Jeho- vah correlated with the appearance of a long-absent Hebrew text in churches in conjunction with the 15th-century introduction of movable-type printing in Europe and the 16th-century Reformation spreading God’s Hebrew/Aramaic Word, along with the Greek, throughout Gentile cultures of Europe.


We ask why a compound shewa appears under yod of the Tetragrammaton when Elohim pointing is utilized, and that's likely due to emphasis on half- vowel seghol “e” of this compound shewa, resulting in by-passing the trans-literated “e” of simple sheva that is less notable in this regard.* Evidently "e" in Jeh is emphasized to the degree that application of simple shewa for a non-gutteral yod is by-passed when pointing of Elohim applies, as applica- tion of a minor rule of full vocalization of qere perpetuum is by-passed when the pointing of Adonai applies.  A simple shewa required in one case, and de- nied in another, indicates the “e” of Jehovah is being emphasized, and that YHWH is a most unique name with an authority transcending grammar rules.


*It appears that pointing of plural Elohim producing Jehovih in English is an indirect reference to the dual plurality of Eloah, from which the multi-plurality Elohim app- ears to derive. Eloah can reflect an emphasis on God in conjunction with the Son of God so that Jehovih would support Trinity doctrine. The pointing of Eloah would maintain the spelling Jehovah in a reference to God the Father since the result would be the appearance of the term Lord Jehovah in English, the supreme Jehovah of the Trinity [Christ said my Father is greater than I (Jn.14:28), which is a matter of authority, not deity, and plural Elohim, in reference to the true God, makes Christ our Jehovah in regard to the Trinity; Christ is the image of the supreme Jehovah (Jn.10: 30, 14:9) so that Isa.9:6 equivalences Him with the everlasting Father].


Summary & Conclusions

Pronunciation of YHWH in approved forms would be for emphasis likely relating to Christ's personalization of unapproachable YHWH associated with Adonai and the plurality of Elohim in the sense of the Trinity that is the basis of Christ's authority to make God personal. In the case of Elohim, God the Father and Christ in the Trinity both relate to I AM, and thus to Jehovah (the name Jehovah includes past, present & future senses of I AM (see www.Hope-of-Israel.org/tetragram.html).


While Yehowah doesn't represent the true pronunciation anymore than Yahweh does, it can be understood as related to a unique intended role for Gentile use of YHWH in the form of Jehovah to avoid the true pronunciation. Since God was never known by the Tetragrammaton name prior to the in- cident with Moses in Exo.3:14 at ~1450 B.C, and since He gave the name to Moses in terms of its meaning, I AM THAT I AM, it appears that the true pro- nunciation never was, and never will be, given to sinful mankind. Indeed, that its letters could have served as consonants or semi-vowels helps ensure that the true pronunciation remains unknown. Further, assigning of the vowels of Adonai and Elohim serves to keep the pronunciation unknown since resultant terms are inconsistent with Hebrew grammar. We readily conclude that the name is sacred, and not to be subjected to abuse like that heaped upon the name Jesus Christ by sinful men, though our Savior ultimately avoids the desecration through His tie to the sacred name through His tie to I AM.


The I AM of Exo.3:14, written ~1450 B.C., relates to Jehovah, and it appears that use of this name through use of the vowels of Adonai did not originate with the Masoretes (contrary to scholars), but has always been a part of text history, in the form Yehowah that's meant to prevent the true pronunciation by sinners. The Elohim pointing for YHWH serves a similar purpose, and would have a similar text history. Of course, it may be that the Masorete pointing is a later form of vocalization properly preserving an earlier one that conveyed the same language.

God's hand on the text accounts for an ancient origin of Jehovah that was meant to apply to the Gentile church much later in history, seeing that ancient Hebrew scribes could have no concept of such matters and no appreciation for a term inconsistent with Hebrew language. The scribes' only concern was avoidance of pronunciation of the sacred name. The revelation of the use of the name Jehovah became popular with men late in time in association with movable-type printing & the Reformation.

God’s Hand on the Text Long after Closing of the Canon

Now Masorete pointing appears in a text masking knowledge of Christ and the Trinity that both act as a basis for approved pronunciation of the sacred name by Hebrews. For Christians, both act as a basis for subtle revelation on the meaning of the sacred name, and provide approved pronunciation of the name in other-language texts. Thus aspects of Hebrew-text tradition and KJV translation, practiced long after the canon closed, show evidence of guidance by God’s hand. We seem to have evidence of God’s hand on approved Heb- rew-manuscript tradition, and also on an approved translation to inform those unacquainted with Hebrew language.